Think
July 20th, 2005
Syracuse University. English and Textual Studies 205. Dr. Donald Morton.
Otherwise known as My Own Personal Hell.
I was, for a little while, an English major in college. I planned to be a writer, of course. Somewhere along the lines, someone convinced me that it wasn’t lucrative enough to warrant a degree from Syracuse University, and about eleventy million dollars in student loans. In retrospect, I’m inclined to agree, however regretful I may be about my decision. But that’s honestly a story for another day.
The class was misery for a college student in every way possible – 8:30 a.m. start time, three days a week, with a reading list that equaled an entire book every two days. The professor was a sex-obsessed linguistic theorist who liked to dabble in Saussure and Derrida. – his explanations of the theories were more obscure than quantum physics, and I spent most of the class confused, angered and utterly frustrated. The trick to passing, I later learned, was doing endless papers deconstructing masterbation and/or sex, particularly within the same gender. A guaranteed B+ at least.
And people say I didn’t get the most out of my education! HA!
Anyway, the point is, I didn’t CARE what the sign and the signifier meant. I couldn’t care less what the structure and subsequent deconstruction of language was – instead, I was content to admire its beauty and wield it as a tool. For me, it was akin to an artist studying the properties and historical significance of paint. Artists don’t CARE about what paint does and how it works together – they care about the end result and what they are trying to create.
Honestly, this could be the shittiest parallel I’ve ever made, but I need to remind you that I hardly paid attention in the class, so my Derrida and Saussure knowledge is, as I mentioned, about as deep as that of my knowledge of quantum physics. In other words, none. And while I’m qualifying, I need to add an amusing aside that my future husband, Adam, was in this very class with me – I distinctly remember him in the back of the room – Professor Morton hated him with an inexplicable passion, we were treated to his daily endless harassment and rude treatement of “Mr R -”, whom I wouldn’t meet until years later, in a different city. We had great fun the night we realized, with shocking realization AFTER we were already married, that we knew each other in college: “That was YOU?” and “OH MY GOD YOU’RE MR. R-!”
Anyway, my feelings about Dr Morton, Saussure and Derrida are much how I felt about the annoying little buggers trying to deconstruct blogging – searching for meaning deep within the text and starting up conferences and panels with titles like, “Reclaiming the Web for Personal Self-Expression,” and the BlogHer conference.
I almost threw up in my mouth when I read some of the points on BlogHer. For me, a panel like, “Reclaiming the Web for Personal Self-Expression,” was like someone saying, back in the day, “Reclaiming Paper for Personal Self Expression.” And anything that uses the word ‘reclaim’ smacks of desperation, rhetoric and frankly, bullshit.
In other words, shut up, and stop talking about the paint. Leave me be. Now, don’t get me wrong, BlogHer has some great points – if I were using this blog to launch a career, as many folks are wont to do, then perhaps I’d feel differently. There are, of course, the Blogerati who sit on their techno-high horses and pontificate about the Web, its meaning, and their royal place in it. Their brilliance is no greater than many others, yet they were early-adopters and quasi-pioneers who struck at the right time. If I were trying to compete with them, then perhaps I’d feel differently, but I’m not.
And then I thought about it some more and I realized how much this medium really is different, and I almost gagged on the remnants of Dr Morton, consumed years ago. But not in any of the ways other people are making it. I love to write. Live to write, in fact. I mean, I never expected corporate communications to be what I do for the rest of my life.
In fact, I’d rather shave my body with a cheese grater and bathe in fresh lemon juice, followed by a poke in the eye with a grapefruit spoon. Writing is really all I’ve ever wanted to do, and blogging gives me an excuse to keep up on it, while writing about whatever I feel like, whenever I feel like it. I don’t care if it seems self-absorbed, as I’ve accused many bloggers of being (yes, that shoe tasted delicious, thanks! The side of crow was particularly tasty!) I didn’t realize that I’m not really doing it for anyone else – it IS self-absorbed and selfish.
Fuck it. Simple, right?
Not so much. What’s different about the Web is that, duh, anyone can read it. I’ve blogged about some seriously personal stuff, and while I don’t regret it – and I’d tell almost anyone anything I’ve written about to their face – it gets dicey when family starts reading it. And friends. And coworkers. And in-laws. I’ll let you guess the only one of those four I have yet to experience.
And then it gets tough. Tough to manage, tough to write about and tough to continue. I mean, I’ve written about drugs, abortion, sex and religion, with a little ditty or two about waxing my ass and KY’ing my lips. I’m certainly not peddling family-friendly fare. I’ve modified some entries to honor Adam’s request not to write about him, lest his coworkers and clients someday accidentally the side of him only I see.
I’m scared, now that they’re reading it. I’m afraid that I’ll stop being honest, and start censoring. When I write for an audience, I suck. And it’s not about them, anyway. I need to remember that.
I don’t want to freak them out, though. I’m terrified that they’ll think that I’m not a nice person, because I’m a little bit – erm, a LOT – irreverent, and I believe in abortion and sex and drugs and all of those things that I did and do not regret. Scared that I’m going to fail to live up to who they thought I was. Scared that I’ll use fuck one too many times, and they’ll think that I’m trashy. And rude, disrespectful and otherwise not what they expected. And a baby-killer to boot. I mean, I’m the same person, and I’m not dishonest around them, but in many ways I’m more ‘me’ here than there – I write more personal things here than I bust out with on your average day.
Fuck.
I don’t care what many people think of me, since you can abandon most of those who don’t approve of your choices, but I do care what family thinks – mine and his. But so help me, I’m going to try so fucking hard not to let that stop me.
Entry Filed under: Nuttin'
7 Comments Add your own
1. mireille | July 20th, 2005 at 10:26 pm
yeah, don’t let that stop you. and don’t deconstruct. and I hope you got that b+ on the same sex stuff. Can we read it? xoxoxo
2. jodiroadie | July 20th, 2005 at 11:07 pm
You know, the real reason I wanted to attend the Blogher conference was to be in the same room as Dooce herself, Heather Armstrong. Needless to say, even though I tried to justify the experience as work-related, my managers wouldn’t pay for me to go. Ha!
Please do not censor yourself in this environment. You’re winning over new (family-ish) readers with your, as they say in Boston, “wicked awesome” personal style.
xo
-j
3. Kate | July 21st, 2005 at 6:02 am
Jonna! I loved your description of that theory class. My personal hell was English 112 with Theresa Ebert, who treated it like a graduate class. I bitched about her all the way through that class.
Sometimes I would look at her up there talking about (Post)-Modernity (she liked to use parenthesis and hyphens for no apparent reason) and think: “Is this a joke? Is this a *satire* of crazy, self-important theorists? Because, if so, this is cool. But if you really take yourself this seriously, you are possibly the biggest ass I’ve ever met.” I could never make up my mind which it was.
As for the self-censorship thing, I’m keeping my blog kind of quiet. I’m only telling certain people, and asking them not to spread it around. One of my co-workers discovered it the other day because I guess I left it up when I was on the reference desk on the shift before his. I don’t really mind of he reads it though.
Why do I care? My blog is pretty tame. But I might want to write more personal stuff there at some point. Also, I think many people would see it as narcissistic/crazy to think I can talk to nature and it talks back. I want a place to explore certain spiritual things, which in some ways are more personal and vulnerable to me than things like my past sexual history or drug use, etc.
So yeah, blogging is great because it’s a way to get your writing out there, but it’s also scary for that very reason. Keep doing what you’re doing. It’s funny as hell, and you’re a good writer.
4. Laura/kyahgirl | July 22nd, 2005 at 12:20 pm
Jonna, I like your honesty and inherent goodness. You don’t dissemble, you don’t B.S., you just face who you are, embrace who you are, and present yourself to the world. I like the person you present and can see you clearly, all the way across a continent and many miles of cyberspace!
Please carry on being yourself here. You are a delight !!! xoxox Laura
5. Tania | July 22nd, 2005 at 12:41 pm
That’s the hardest part: staying honest. Self-censorship is easy. It’s deciding to tell everyone else to bugger off, because you’re going to be candid, that’s the hard part.
It’s not a blog issue. It’s a writing issue. Sometimes when I think of those memoirs the ladies are writing about all the people they’ve slept with, all the drugs they’ve done, and all the crap they’ve charged on their credit cards, memoirs that are making quite a profit in Barnes & Noble, I think, “What do their mamas think?”
The point being, for myself, that the only way to be a real writer is to stop worrying what your mama thinks. I have to tell my husband over and over that I’m probably going to write things that hurt him, things that he doesn’t want to know, but it’s my life, and I’m a writer, and I’m not going to stop being a writer because I don’t want to hurt people. I have to tell myself every day.
Which isn’t to say I don’t exercise discretion. I do. I may write about drugs and sex and death and fear and rock and roll, but it doesn’t mean I want to ruin anyone’s life but my own. I try to be discreet about other people’s privacy. But I reserve the right to wield my own as I please, you know?
But I have to keep reasserting it. It’s just so easy to backslide into being chicken.
For instance, a friend of mine just wrote that she’d run into the sister of an old crush of mine, and would it be OK to give my former crush’s sister my blog URL?
Sure, I said…just let me edit that post about him…OK, now it’s fine.
So yeah, I know what you’re talking about. Chin up. We’re in this writing thing together. It’s worth doing. Writing honestly is one of the last noble acts. We’ve got to keep it up, or civilization is DOOMED.
Oh, and by the way, I freaking LOVED all that literary theory shit in college. I am the nerd of all time.
6. katiedid | July 25th, 2005 at 1:56 pm
Hee: I am a nerd! I care about the paint, uh… actual paint, not metaphorical paint that is. If you want to use acrylics and oils on the same canvas, you gotta know how they work chemically with each other.
Some of the deconstructing of language and reconstructing it can be interesting, I think. But after a while most folks discussing it start getting so into the conversation that the whole subject becomes abstract to the point of meaninglessness. I’m of the opinion that “whereof one cannot speak, thereof one should pass over in silence.” Language theory and philosophy, is after all, still philosophy.
7. Anonymous | July 29th, 2005 at 9:15 am
Don’t you dare think about censoring yourself! The sometimes funny, sometimes infuriating paradox of human nature is that some people seem hell-bent on denying it, in themselves, and others.
Your honesty in showing us yours – well, it just reinforces my belief that the bad stuff is still good stuff, simply because it’s OUR stuff.
T
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed